I want to know...   Pots. Pits. Pics. Prose.
www.sibbotery.com

twitter.com/sibbotery:

    Why We Have to Go Back to a 40-Hour Work Week to Keep Our Sanity | AlterNet →

    If you’re lucky enough to have a job right now, you’re probably doing everything possible to hold onto it. If the boss asks you to work 50 hours, you work 55. If she asks for 60, you give up weeknights and Saturdays, and work 65.  

    Odds are that you’ve been doing this for months, if not years, probably at the expense of your family life, your exercise routine, your diet, your stress levels, and your sanity. You’re burned out, tired, achy, and utterly forgotten by your spouse, kids and dog. But you push on anyway, because everybody knows that working crazy hours is what it takes to prove that you’re “passionate” and “productive” and “a team player” — the kind of person who might just have a chance to survive the next round of layoffs.

    This is what work looks like now. It’s been this way for so long that most American workers don’t realize that for most of the 20th century, the broad consensus among American business leaders was that working people more than 40 hours a week was stupid, wasteful, dangerous, and expensive — and the most telling sign of dangerously incompetent management to boot.

    It’s a heresy now (good luck convincing your boss of what I’m about to say), but every hour you work over 40 hours a week is making you less effective and productive over both the short and the long haul. And it may sound weird, but it’s true: the single easiest, fastest thing your company can do to boost its output and profits — starting right now, today — is to get everybody off the 55-hour-a-week treadmill, and back onto a 40-hour footing.

    Yes, this flies in the face of everything modern management thinks it knows about work. So we need to understand more. How did we get to the 40-hour week in the first place? How did we lose it? And are there compelling bottom-line business reasons that we should bring it back?

    THIS. DAMMIT. 

    (Source: silas216, via bankston)

    — 1 year ago with 68 notes
    1. canadamaple reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    2. wozziebear reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    3. southernfeminist reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    4. sibbotery reblogged this from bankston and added:
      THIS. DAMMIT.
    5. mydaywithd reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
    6. polymathlete reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    7. vgmgc reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    8. castielappreciationlife reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    9. theyoungwitch reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    10. stringsdafistmcgee reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    11. kristaferrobin reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    12. hairyprincess reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    13. thesmallandmeek reblogged this from browngurlwfro
    14. browngurlwfro reblogged this from sageoflogic
    15. winterofcontent reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    16. sageoflogic reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
    17. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from silas216
    18. awhisperpoetic reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
      Omg, Amen!
    19. bankston reblogged this from silas216
    20. corporationindustry reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    21. the-whore-of-gallifrey reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    22. bigstarlet reblogged this from silas216
    23. ronijohn reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
    24. introvertedart reblogged this from silas216